January 15, 2026

Prologue in Sermons: January 15


Careful Reflection on the Things We See in the World Can Give Us Lessons That Are Saving For Us

January 15

(Instruction on the Heavenly Kingdom and on Eternal Punishment)

By Archpriest Victor Guryev

The Holy Fathers teach that the whole visible world which we see is, as it were, a book from which we may learn how to build the salvation of our soul. “Just as the author of a book,” teaches Saint Tikhon of Voronezh, “brings forth words from his own mind and writes them on paper, and in this way composes a book, and as it were makes something out of nothing; so the wise and almighty Creator created everything that He had in His divine mind and that He willed, and composed, as it were, a book consisting of two pages, that is, heaven and earth” (Spiritual Treasury, part 1, “The World”). “Every thing and all the creations of God,” writes Saint Basil the Great, “are the same as letters by which we read.” Thus, brethren, the Holy Fathers teach. Let us attend to this teaching and try to understand: how does the world serve as a book for us? How are we to read this book, and how are we to draw from it lessons for our salvation? To resolve these questions, let us turn directly to the matter.

On Russia’s Attack Against the Ecumenical Patriarchate


Chrysa Makri

Recent history has shown that ecclesiastical diplomacy often precedes geopolitical developments. When, in 2018, the Ecumenical Throne handed over the Tomos of autocephaly to the Ukrainian Church, no one could have foreseen Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine a few years later. Most, in fact, regarded such a scenario as far-fetched.

Vladimir Putin, however, has shown to those capable of analyzing his actions that he has often used the power and influence exercised by religion as a tool to control Orthodox Christians. To this end, he first used the late Patriarch of Moscow Alexy, who was of Estonian origin—born and raised in Tallinn—and today his successor Kirill, who serves as the standard-bearer of the Church of Moscow for Russia’s penetration into the millions of faithful in Orthodox countries.

The separation of the Ukrainian Church from the Patriarchate of Moscow dealt a heavy blow to Russia, and relations between the Patriarchates of Moscow and Constantinople entered a chapter of division between the two Churches.

With regard to the latest developments and the attack launched by the Patriarchate of Moscow against the Ecumenical Patriarch, the pretext was the request of the Orthodox Church of Lithuania, as well as the country’s government, for the establishment of an Exarchate of the Ecumenical Patriarchate there—a request that the Phanar granted. The Russians now accuse Patriarch Bartholomew of “encroachment” into Russia’s “territories” and attempt to slander him, claiming that he serves “interests,” “spies,” and “planted neo-Nazis.”

Explaining the position of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, Metropolitan Demetrios of the Princes’ Islands, speaking to parapolitika.gr, stressed that “the peoples of these states are the ones who decide the future of their lives, and I believe that they wish to break free from Russia’s influence. What is being written against our Patriarchate has political motives. They want to harm the Ecumenical Patriarchate.”

The essence of the matter is that the Russians see themselves losing their footholds in the autonomous Churches of the Baltic States—namely Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia—and for this reason they are launching this attack, Metropolitan Gregory of Peristeri told parapolitika.gr. He served the Church of Estonia for four years (2005–2009) and is currently in Tallinn as part of efforts to address the new crisis.

The Background of the Autonomy of the Baltic States

Fear of war and hostility toward the Patriarchate of Moscow have ecclesiastically turned Northern Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania toward the Ecumenical Patriarchate. In 1923, the Phanar granted autonomy to the Churches of Finland and Estonia, and in 1936 to the Church of Latvia. In 1945, however, after Stalin annexed the three countries to the Soviet Union, he abolished the autonomy of the three Churches and bound them to the Patriarchate of Moscow. At the same time, during Stalin’s era, a Metropolis was established that was directly connected to the Patriarchate of Moscow.

According to Metropolitan Gregory of Peristeri, on the basis of this history the current administration of the Patriarchate of Moscow considers the entire Church of Latvia to belong to it. However, as he points out, since 1991 the Baltic States have become independent. Nevertheless, Moscow insists that the Churches of the three countries, as well as the Church of Ukraine, still fall under the jurisdiction of the Russian Church.

“They unjustly, uncanonically, entirely without basis consider that, because from 1945 to 1990 Stalin ‘seized’ the Churches, they have acquired a right of ownership over them to this day. Such a thing does not exist, does not stand, and has no validity,” explains the Metropolitan of Peristeri.

Throughout all these years of confrontation, Moscow has never missed an opportunity to undermine the prestige of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, accusing it of being “schismatic,” along with the Patriarchate of Alexandria, and the Churches of Greece and Cyprus, which recognized the autocephaly of the Church of Ukraine.

It is also worth noting that the crisis in relations between the three countries and Russia is not recent. In January 2024, the Estonian authorities expelled Metropolitan Evgeny, who headed the metochion of the Russian Orthodox Church in Estonia, considering him a threat to the country’s national security.

This event was linked to geopolitical tensions and Estonia’s concerns over Moscow’s expansionist intentions. According to Metropolitan Gregory of Peristeri, “at this moment the Baltic States are living under a sense of threat. Whatever the Russians demanded in Ukraine, they have also demanded for Estonia,” raising fears that what happened in Ukraine could also occur in the Baltic countries.

Source: Translated by John Sanidopoulos.
 

The Phanar in Moscow’s Crosshairs: Behind the Hatred, a Plan for Dominance


By Fr. Panagiotis Kapodistrias
Protopresbyter of the Ecumenical Throne

The confrontation between Russia and the Ecumenical Patriarchate is not a temporary phenomenon, nor can it be explained simply through theological differences. At its core lies a deep ideological and geopolitical conflict that has taken shape over centuries and has reached its peak in recent years. The Russian concept of the “Third Rome” constitutes the cornerstone of this tension. The Russian Church, and by extension the Russian state, regards Moscow as the natural successor to Constantinople and the spiritual guide of the Orthodox world. This unhistorical and unfounded view leaves no room for recognizing Constantinople as the canonical and spiritual center of Orthodoxy.

Vladimir Putin and Patriarch Kirill reinforce this mindset in a manner that goes beyond the bounds of religiosity and fully enters the realm of state ideology. The Russian Church functions as an ideological arm of the state, providing metaphysical legitimacy to political and military actions. Patriarch Bartholomew, through his words and stance, stands in opposition to this approach. He upholds the spiritual independence of the Church, rejects its instrumentalization by the state, and defends synodality and canonical order.

The granting of autocephaly to the Ukrainian Church in 2018 was the straw that broke the camel’s back. On the one hand, this act restored a people’s right to ecclesiastical self-governance; on the other, it directly affected Moscow’s interests, which until then had regarded Ukraine as its “ecclesiastical territory.” Russia viewed this action as a threat — not only spiritual but also geopolitical. The tension escalated with the Russian Church’s severance of communion with the Phanar and with a fierce propaganda campaign aimed at delegitimizing the Ecumenical Patriarch.

Patriarch Bartholomew, through his clear stance against the war in Ukraine, his defense of peace, and his consistent position in favor of Orthodox unity, emerges as a disruptive factor for the Russian narrative. His international recognition, his relations with other Christian denominations, and his adherence to canonical order strengthen his standing on a global level — and this provokes a reaction. Russia systematically seeks to portray him as an “instrument of the West,” with the aim of weakening his influence within the Orthodox world.

The hostility toward the Ecumenical Patriarchate is by no means the result of personal differences, but rather a deliberate strategy of dismantling. Through it, resourceful Russia attempts to promote its own hegemony in Orthodoxy, using every means — theological, propagandistic, geopolitical. The Phanar, with its historic and enduring course, its uninterrupted spiritual contribution, and its independence, constitutes an obstacle to this ambition.

The rivalry persists on unequal terms. On the one side stand power and authority; on the other, spiritual authenticity. What provokes Russian hostility is the resilience and influence of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, even without a state apparatus. And as long as this influence endures, the Phanar will continue to trouble those who view the Church as a tool of politics.

Source: Translated by John Sanidopoulos.
 

January 14, 2026

Saint Nina as a Model for our Lives

St. Nina (Feast Day - January 14)

By Protopresbyter Fr. George Papavarnavas

Saint Nina was born in the 3rd century A.D. in Cappadocia to pious parents: Zebulon, who was a relative of the Holy Great Martyr George the Trophy-Bearer, and Susanna. Her father was a renowned general of the Roman army during the reign of Emperor Maximian. However, out of great love for Christ, he abandoned the army and, with the consent of his wife, became a monk in the desert of the Jordan. Her mother was the sister of Juvenal, Bishop of Jerusalem, and after her husband’s departure to the desert of the Jordan, she was appointed — by the bishop’s blessing — as a deaconess at the Holy Church of the Resurrection of Christ, having first entrusted their daughter Nina to the most devout Eldress Nikephora, who raised her “in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.” That is, she taught her prayer, participation in the worship of the Church, and the study of the God-inspired Scriptures. For this reason Nina’s heart was filled with love for God and for human beings, and she desired to preach the gospel, like the Apostles.

When she reached adulthood, following an exhortation of the Most Holy Theotokos, she journeyed to what is now Georgia. There, through her inspired preaching, her radiant example, and the miracles that God worked through her, she succeeded in drawing people away from lifeless idols and leading them to the true faith — first the rulers of Georgia, King Mirian and Queen Nana, and then the people, that is, the simple folk as well as those of the so-called higher social classes. To this day the people of Georgia honor Saint Nina and regard her as the patroness of their country, after Saint George. She reposed in peace, and her holy relic remained incorrupt.

Homily for the Commemoration of the Holy Equal-to-the-Apostles Nina (Fr. Daniel Sysoev)


Homily for the Commemoration of the Holy Equal-to-the-Apostles Nina 

By Fr. Daniel Sysoev

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit!

I congratulate you all on the feast day of Saint Nina, Equal-to-the-Apostles, Enlightener of Georgia! Saint Nina converted the people of Georgia from the darkness of unbelief to the Light of Christ, and we see that in Christ there is neither female nor male, and every person can ascend to the unimaginable heights of divine vision and see the Light of God, as Saint Nina did. Her life is described in detail in the Iveron Paterikon, but I will remind you of its highlights for the benefit of our souls.

Saint Nina was a relative of the Holy Great Martyr George, which is why Georgia is labeled "Georgia" on all English-language maps, in honor of the Holy Great Martyr George the Victorious. Saint Nina's mother was the sister of the ruling Patriarch of Jerusalem. From childhood, she decided to dedicate her life to serving God and become a nun. At that time, monasticism did not yet exist, but there were people who lived near churches, did not marry, and dedicated their entire lives to serving God. One day, in a dream, Nina saw the Mother of God, who gave her a cross woven from grapevines and commanded her to go to her inheritance, which had been assigned to her by lot during her lifetime, but which the Archangel Gabriel refused to allow her to enter, saying that God would be pleased to enlighten this land in the coming years.

Holy Fathers Massacred at Sinai in the Hymnography of the Orthodox Church


By Fr. George Dorbarakis

These Saints, longing for the ascetic life, abandoned everything of the world and dwelt in the desert. With them was also the blessed Nilus, who had formerly been prefect of Constantinople, the one who, with power of speech and by the grace of the Holy Spirit, composed excellent writings that guide one in ascetic life in Christ, and who described the way of life, as well as the captivity and the murder of these venerable fathers. For they were slain by the barbarians called the ‘Blemmyes,’ who ranged from Arabia to Egypt and along the desert of the Red Sea.

Many years earlier, during the reign of Diocletian and in the time of Peter, Archbishop of Alexandria, other monks were also slain who likewise lived in stillness on Mount Sinai. The Saracens who dwelt on Mount Sinai went out, when the leader of their tribe died, and killed many of the ascetics. The remaining ascetics fled to the fortress. During the night a flame of fire appeared to the Saracens, burning the entire Mountain, and the flame rose up to heaven. The Saracens saw this and were afraid; they threw down their weapons and fled.

Those who were slain first were thirty-eight, bearing various wounds on their bodies. Of these, two were found alive, Savvas and Isaiah. Of those who were killed, some had their heads completely severed, others had their skin hanging from one side, and others were cut in two. These were buried by the two monks, who also recounted to us what had happened to them.


The Holy Abbas whom we celebrate today are doubly crowned by God: both for their ascetic labors as monks and for their athletic contests as martyrs. 

“From ascetic labors you passed into athletic contests; and adorned with double crowns, you fervently beseech the Savior that we may be saved.” 

Our hymnography indeed always emphasizes, in such cases of venerable martyrs, that the relationship between ascetic conduct and martyrdom is one of cause and effect. The martyrdom of blood often constitutes the consistent culmination of the martyrdom of conscience, which a monk above all experiences through his ascetic struggle. This is also what Saint Joseph, the Hymnographer of the Canon of the Holy Abbas, points out: 

“Venerable Fathers, meditating day and night on the law of the Lord, you were deemed worthy to become one with the Lord, the Tree of Life; and your fruit blossomed into crowns of contest.”

The correlation made by the Holy Hymnographer between the ascetic tears of the Holy Abbas and the outpouring of their martyric blood continues. He sees the holy ascetics as an extension of the Israelites, who, under the guidance of Moses, were able to escape the tyranny of Pharaoh in Egypt and drown his armies in the Red Sea. For them, the sea in this instance was their tears, in which they drowned the noetic Pharaoh, the devil; and then, through the shedding of their blood in martyrdom, they finally destroyed him and consigned him to oblivion: 

“In the sea of tears you first drowned the noetic Pharaoh, O wise ones; and afterwards, in the channels of your blood, you destroyed him and sent him to utter disappearance.”

And it is a fact that Saint Joseph emphasizes a reality of broader significance: it is not possible for the devil, the enemy of the salvation of the human race, to be defeated by the believer unless that person — whether monk or living in the world — walks in repentance, that is, with awareness of his sins and with tears that wash them away. When the Lord Himself, among other things, blessed those who mourn for their sins and for the sins of the world, there is no possibility of anyone diminishing this truth: “Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted,” He said in His Sermon on the Mount.

The blessing of those who mourn is in reality, according to Saint Joseph, a blessing of those who by the grace of God have seen the depth of reality: that absolute priority belongs to the eternal and abiding things, and not to the trivial things of the earthly, unstable, and fluid matters of this world. Only the one, in other words, who has oriented his existence toward the eternal God can transcend whatever constitutes the deceptive allure of the present world and weep for his sins. The Apostle Paul expressed this clearly: “We do not look at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen; for the things which are seen are temporary, but the things which are not seen are eternal.” The Holy Hymnographer moves along the same lines, referring to today’s Saints: 

“Looking toward the eternity of the abiding things, O wise ones, you rejected the base and lowly character of the unstable and fluid earthly things; therefore you are blessed, O venerable martyrs.”

This godly mourning, due to the transfer of their existence to the eternal realities, made the Venerable Martyr Abbas live as monks with a contrite mind. And this contrition revealed their humility and consequently their true worship of God: “A broken and contrite heart God will not despise.” Saint Joseph the Hymnographer employs this contrition in order to describe in a single stroke the entire life of the Saints: 

“Having worshiped God with a contrite mind, you shattered the pride of the enemy, O blessed ones, and were yourselves broken in body and slain by his sword.” 

Thus the Holy Abbas were revealed quite literally as Paradise, giving a practical answer to all those who irrationally seek earthly paradises. And what do they proclaim? Paradise is the relationship with Christ. He is the true Paradise, and whoever is united with Him likewise becomes Paradise. 

“You were shown to be a Paradise of delight, having in your midst the Tree of Life, the Lord, who accepted your blood as a sacrifice.”

Source: Translated by John Sanidopoulos.
 

Homily for the Baptism of Christ, or Theophany (Fr. Daniel Sysoev)


Homily for the Baptism of Christ, or Theophany 

By Fr. Daniel Sysoev

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit!

I congratulate you all on the feast of the Theophany — the Baptism of the Lord! Today we celebrate the day when the Lord God revealed His inner nature, when the Lord appeared as the Triune Godhead! God the Father proclaimed His Son from Heaven, the Son was baptized by John in the Jordan, and the Holy Spirit rested upon Christ in the form of a dove. Thus, for the first time, we experienced the mystery of the life-giving and indivisible Trinity. We know that God is one, that God is Existent, Almighty, Omniscient, Righteous, Omnipresent, upholding all things with His power, but we would never have known what His inner life is like had He not revealed it to us. As Nikolai of Serbia said: "Previously, people knew that God is one, but they were very far from Him, so they saw only some distant flame of life force, but now, through the Incarnation of Jesus Christ, we are placed very close to the blazing hearth of God." And now we see that God is three Lights united as one.

Prologue in Sermons: January 14

 

Against Idle Talk

January 14

(A Discourse on Sinners Buried in the Church)


By Archpriest Victor Guryev

Many Christians don't restrain their tongues and, without thought or caution, blurt out whatever comes into their heads. When they are told that this is wrong and that they will have to answer to God for their thoughtless words, they pay no attention and reply, "So what if we talk too much? We won't get into trouble for that; for words are like water."

Is that so?

January 13, 2026

Saint Jeremiah I, Ecumenical Patriarch and Founder of the Sacred Monastery of Saint Nicholas "Stavronikita" on Mount Athos


By Panagiotis V. Koulpas,
Faculty of Theology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Saint Jeremiah was born in the year 1485[1] in Zitsa of Ioannina. He was a man of great piety and virtue, though of limited formal education. At a young age he came under the guidance of the then Metropolitan of Ioannina, Theoleptos. The latter, appreciating the gifts of the young man from Ioannina, took him under his protection, tonsured him a monk, and ordained him deacon and presbyter. Later, the young Archimandrite Jeremiah went to Constantinople as a co-worker of his spiritual father, Metropolitan Theoleptos of Ioannina. The latter was elected Ecumenical Patriarch in the year 1518. In 1520 Saint Jeremiah was appointed Metropolitan of Sofia in Bulgaria.

Subsequently, in the year 1522,[2] he was elected for the first time Ecumenical Patriarch, as “Jeremiah I,” succeeding his deceased spiritual father and predecessor, Theoleptos. Nevertheless, he was compelled to be re-enthroned on the throne of the Apostle Andrew the First-Called in 1525, due to the uncanonical actions of Metropolitan Joannikios of Sozopolis. He remained in this position until 1537. As shepherd of Byzantium, Saint Jeremiah distinguished himself for his wisdom and humility, while at the same time showing particular zeal for the orderly functioning of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. He sent patriarchal letters regulating various matters of an administrative nature. He founded new dioceses (Argos and Nafplio, and Rhodes), restored the privileges of the Sacred Monastery of Eikosifoinissa on Mount Pangaion in Drama,[3] settled the issue of the election of the Archbishop of Sinai, and finally saved many churches of Constantinople from demolition by the Turks.